Let me tell you a story . . . about a Prince who would not become a King. The whole situation is clearly seen in this photo on the left. A young Prince Charles of Wales stands behind his young mother, Elizabeth, Queen of England. The photo appears to have been taken in the middle 1960’s. Elizabeth had become Queen in 1953 and is now (2018) 92 years of age. Charles is currently 70 years of age. Mother and son have been Queen and Prince for most of those 70 years.
This series of postings is planned to cover five major events in Charles’ life. Through these five blog postings we will come to better understand this man and how his unique life has shaped him. A brief look at his natal chart will be undertaken before examining a tragedy in his young life.

We will note the symbol of England, Leo the Lion, rising at the Ascendant degree. Charles exhibits his pride today, but that was not always the case. His Sun is in the sign of Scorpio at the cusp of the 5th house. Charles exhibits many Scorpio traits, brooding and secretive, interested in the occult and understanding the under-pinnings of the world around him, having deep feelings and concerns which are often not expressed. Perhaps Pluto and Ceres, found in the 1st house, most easily describe some aspects of his early life. Charles was a fragile child. Pluto and Ceres indicate problems with the assimilation of foods as well as coping with a mother who appears distant from the child’s point of view. Elizabeth was, in fact, a very-present mother to Charles when she was home and not occupied with matters of state.
Charles did indeed exhibit a less-than-robust constitution. And his parents duties and trips, plus being shuttled from one school to another each year, all left him feeling a bit lonely. He often found older adults to fill part of the parental role he needed in his life. Charles’ Moon is in the Gibbous phase relative to the Sun (135 to 180 degrees ahead of the Sun). This indicates an inquiring and analytical mind; where one works to fit into the world, contribute to the world, adjusting to being a perfectionist in a casual world. Life will seem to be a search for becoming better functioning in what ever role life hands him.
His t/Moon-opposite-n/Sun in the 7th house chart is shown below.

t/Moon-opp-n/Sun-7th indicates difficulties with managing relationships. One’s own reactions to those relationships are deeply felt. One should note that t/Sun squares this opposition pattern; suggesting that a male will be involved – perhaps a royal male if the very close t/Jupiter is considered. We can take note of other patterns in this chart.
- n/Part-of-Fortune (n/PoF) is at the MC; Charles’ goals, life status and public image is subject to change. We should note its counterpart, t/PoF-11th-opposite-t/Mercuryj-n/Asc. Upsetting (opposition) news (t/Mercury) will personally (n/Asc.) affect him.
- Since the n/Asc. is part of this, we should note the chart’s Asc. with t/Chiron. Deep hurts and prior sensitivities will be experienced. Chiron’s conjoining with Vesta points to a practicality in dealing with those hurts that may arise.
- We can’t overlook that t/Mercury is conjoining the n/Asc. while n/Mercury is found at the chart’s Descendant angle. ‘Doubled-up Merucry’s’ indicate very important news or documents being involved during this cycle.
- ‘Doubled up Mercury’s and doubled-up PoF’s indicate great upsets are in store for Charles.
(Story teller) There exists, in these above words, the foundation for a story. Changes due to news leaves one in a state of anticipation. What might these changes consist of? On August 27, 1979 his close uncle, “Dickie” Mountbatten, was killed by a bomb planted on his fishing boat, the Shadow V. Mountbatten’s grandson, and two others were killed, three others were seriously injured. Charles is said to have been ‘shattered’ by the news and poured out his grief into his private journal. “Dickie” had been one of those older ‘mentors’ that filled a void in his life caused by both his parents duties that left little time for him, and his movement between a series of public-private schools that kept him away from home. In actuality, “Dickie” was 2nd cousin, one removed, to Charles’ mother. He had taken a personal interest in preparing Charles for the life that he would come to lead. The man responsible for the bombing was caught and sentenced to life imprisonment but was released some 19 years later in the political accords that ended the conflict between England and Northern Ireland.
The chart for this tragedy is shown below, a diurnally Advanced chart set for 13 days after the prior t/Moon-opposite-n/Sun Return chart.

In the intervening two weeks (almost) the chart’s MC has advanced from 16 to 28 degrees of Capricorn. Previously the chart’s MC had been joined by the n/PoF. On this fateful day the t/PoF is at the IC, opposite the MC. Let us review this, for an important interpretive point is seen here.
When an angle and a planet/point are angular in a Return chart, and later we find the other version (natal or transiting) of that planet/point to be present in an Advanced chart – at an angle – we would typically say that this was a coincidence. There are no coincidences. This is like the chart ‘screaming’ at us to pay attention. The vertical axis is our life’s well being and status. When symbols of change (PoF, Uranus, Moon) are present, then ‘change’ will affect us.
- In the Return chart we found t/Chiron at the Ascendant. Here, two weeks later, we find n/Chiron at the Desc. This is related to the statement above. We can also see this as a “doubling up process from one chart to the next.” Chiron symbolizes past hurts and issues, and the present closing and opening of ‘doors.’ In this case, a bomb explosion has closed a door for young Charles.
- Even if not angular, we always have to take note of t/Sun, t/Moon and t/PoF. Here we note t/Moon-opposite-n/Moon. A huge conflict of emotions exists on this date. This emotional event (Moon-Moon) squares the t/PoF within a few degrees.
- Since a bomb was the cause of these upsetting changes, we have to ask, “What role does Mars play in all of this?” t/Mars opposes n/PoF, having moved from 4 degrees Cancer two weeks ago to 12 degrees Cancer now where it opposes n/PoF. n/Mars is deep into the 7th house, still technically angular, where it conjoins t/Neptune. Mars-Neptune relates to the bomb on the boat, although many astrologers would not likely predict this ahead of time.
So, the angular planets and planet-counterparts found elsewhere do tell us the story of this day. Our ability, as astrologers, to forecast this ahead of time, is always being tested.
How close we come to ‘forecasting’ the story depends upon how close we are to the people and the flow of their daily life we are. Knowing the CONTEXT of the subject’s life is important. Without it, we can quote generalities. We can also note the exact date when the chart’s promise will likely be fulfilled.
Relative to relationships, how would the astrologer pinpoint who would be the victim that caused to grief that Charles felt on this day? The rules for family relationships say that an Aunt or Uncle, for a man, on his mothers side is the 6th house. Grief is symbolized by the 12th house and Saturn. It is difficult to apply these rules to the above chart. The one obvious (most obvious, perhaps) is t/Mars-opposite-n/PoF. n/PoF is in the natal 6th house. Does this mean that most “chance and change” situations associated with the PoF will carry a 6th house meaning? It is easy to cherry-pick associations after the fact, difficult to do so before the fact.
Dave
Let me tell you a story . . . about how a retirement came to an end. After all of the decades of break-ins, rapes and murders, and then — nothing. It all came to a fitting end. We have all seen TV advertisements about tracking one’s ancestry, finding out where in the world we came from, determining what we are medically susceptible to. With the establishment of DNA databases, the police decided to take a still-viable rape kit and test it. The found an extensive family tree linked to that DNA. From that information they identified each individual by age, location and employee during the long unsolved crime spree. They finally narrowed it down to one suspect, J. J. DeAngelo. Following him, the police were able, on April 18, 2018, to obtain a DNA sample from a truck door handle, and later from a discarded tissue.





The Story Teller notes that having a ‘back story’ or a ‘reason behind the plot’ is important. One can more readily identify with the villain when his inner conflicts are known and his outer form of expression — whether perfect or imperfect — are known. We can watch what is done against what drives one forward and project what will happen as well as think about how we might find ourselves in a similar and perilous situation. In this case we have long-term issues that work in the background (the cycles of the two outer planets) and the immediate, almost routine in a gross way, invasions of private homes to rape and murder.













Let me tell you a story . . . about a young man who lost his way at an early age and then lost his life and future. He didn’t wish to be lost, he tried several avenues to pursue. Each attempt, for him, did not work out. Over time frustration with his own problems was turned outward and seen as the fault of others. For some, this is expressed as anger, as social activism, as criminal behavior such as robbery. For Mark Conditt it was all about bombs.

Let me tell you a story . . . about the futile pursuit of ‘revenge’ against oneself. Conditt had succeeded in killing two and injuring two on March 2nd and 12th, 2018. The police and FBI had responded with a massive hunt for him. Suspicions led the authorities to look for package bomb deliveries. Cautionary news announcements had everyone on the alert — both the public and the delivery service companies. Conditt decided to change his tactics. On March 18, 2018, he set up a bomb that would explode when a trip-wire was activated. Two were injured. 
Every story teller knows that bringing in a mystery prior to a ‘building conclusion’ to a story helps to highlight the tension and the interest of the audience or readers. This is the case here, unknowingly, by Conditt. We know he is conflicted about his personal life, his inability to support himself and to prove himself against some standard that only he knows. He has turned around his own self-disappointment and anger and projected it out upon ‘others’. The ‘why’ is hard to understand. What can be known to the reader, to the Austin, Texas public, was that this was approaching an end point.


